Thursday, March 1, 2012

Complaining about GW: Is this thing even on?

Having read a few articles about this snazzy new internet thing and social media, I thought I'd take a look at some of tools we have available to get an idea of what these tools would be telling Games Workshop if they were to bother.  Based on the blogs I read, most of them I consider 'mainstream' blogs for the more competitive side of the hobby, my distillation of the dozens of posts were,while mostly positive, many had a strong negative undercurrent.  Nobody is really going to complain about new models after all - especially when for the most part, they look as good as these do (sorry t-wolves, 'nids won the swimsuit and dinner gown competition).  But lots of speculation about the lawsuits, negativity about the size, the two-year delayed release, and GW's staccato business model in general.  So what does all that noise amount to through the lens of a social media analytic?

I started here: http://www.johnchow.com/7-ways-to-track-your-competition-with-social-media/ to check out the tools available, tried a couple, and settled on Social Mention, being that it doesn't require a login, is free, and unlike Topsy, isn't limited to Twitter.  While not intended as an advertisement for Social Mention, there's a lot you can do on this page.    Starting with the "all time" and "all sources" setting, for blogs, tweets, comments, video, podcasts, etc..., querying on Games Workshop had 700+ mentions, with 13% chance their brand is being talked about at any given moment, a 6:1 positive vs negative sentiment ratio, a 39% passion score which is pretty good - measuring repeated mentions by the same individuals, rather than isolated mentions by different people, and a 39% reach - measuring how many authors divided by total mentions: roughly a range of influence measure.

13%
strength
6:1
sentiment
39%
passion
39%
reach
8 minutes avg. per mention
last mention 8 minutes ago
382 unique authors
12 retweets


Repeating this for "Tyranid" as a keyword came back with 538 mentions and the following scores:

3%
strength
7:1
sentiment
38%
passion
35%
reach
54 minutes avg. per mention
last mention 31 minutes ago
279 unique authors
3 retweets


Seven to one positives is pretty spiffy.  With the release tomorrow, "tervigon" had a pretty fantastic ratio:

2%
strength
15:1
sentiment
40%
passion
25%
reach
3 hours avg. per mention
last mention 2 hours ago
150 unique authors
3 retweets


I decided to shift tactics, and see how deep I could get on some more pointed topics.  Given some of the negative comments about the two year wait, I checked "Games Workshop" and "release" - but the happy happy joy joy crowd for tomorrow led to a 20:1 positive sentiment score.  Back to the drawing board.  How about "Games Workshop" and "business"  Ahh..

1%
strength
2:1
sentiment
31%
passion
14%
reach
4 hours avg. per mention
last mention 2 hours ago
70 unique authors
2 retweets

Different story now.  A 2-1 positive ratio and only 139 mentions.  Now that I've let my subscription go due to its pattern of suck last year, how about "White Dwarf" ?  564 mentions:

5%
strength
3:1
sentiment
18%
passion
37%
reach
10 minutes avg. per mention
last mention 22 minutes ago
325 unique authors
8 retweets

3:1 ratio isn't grand.  How about a competitor?  Looking at "Warmachine" returned a 3:1 as well, but interestingly, had more mentions than any of the Games Workshop queries. Note the difference in the passion score as well - a smaller fanbase, but more vocal:

15%
strength
3:1
sentiment
51%
passion
34%
reach
18 minutes avg. per mention
last mention 42 minutes ago
306 unique authors
25 retweets


At any rate - I can (rather obviously) get carried away here.  The point being from a social media perspective, everything looks pretty rosy.  By comparison, Raspberry Pi, the runaway soldout credit-card sized Linux computer storming the tech media over the past two days scores like this:

25%
strength
6:1
sentiment
32%
passion
38%
reach
20 seconds avg. per mention
last mention 40 seconds ago
352 unique authors
45 retweets


The bottom line is if we're as negative as people think, we're not making a big splash.  If we want GW to sit up and take notice, we don't need to do something we don't want to do - not buy more models /grin

We have to hit them where it HURTS: their earnings expectations.
The expectations market is the world in which shares in companies are traded between investors—in other words, the stock market. In this market, investors assess the real market activities of a company today and, on the basis of that assessment, form expectations as to how the company is likely to perform in the future. The consensus view of all investors and potential investors as to expectations of future performance shapes the stock price of the company.
If we can figure out how to leverage the social media sources that market research companies use to write assessments of GW's expected performance, we'll get their attention.

1 comment:

  1. Welcome to the world of interwebs, where most people only bitch on line about buying new models/armies yet are eager to throw their wallets at GW clerks...

    You see very few people actually taking a stad, either finding ways to proxy models or moving on to another - more balanced - game.

    Luckly we in Brazil are taking our stand lol

    ReplyDelete